scotch: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents whiskey
Weight: 0.68
, product
Weight: 0.59
, alcoholic beverage
Weight: 0.59
, spirit
Weight: 0.53
, drink
Weight: 0.53
Siblings bourbon
Weight: 0.36
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.36
, vodka
Weight: 0.36
, brandy
Weight: 0.36
, scotch tape
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be more costly than port 0.79
be expensive in restaurants 0.78
be at restaurants expensive 0.78
be in clubs expensive 0.77
be at clubs expensive 0.77
be cheap on snapdeal 0.77
cost more 0.76
be cheaper online than than store 0.76
cost 99 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(drink, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(whiskey, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(product, be cheap on snapdeal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(product, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(product, be cheaper online than than store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, is expensive)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drink, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(whiskey, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(drink, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(product, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(product, be cheaper online than than store)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(product, cost more)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(product, be cheap on snapdeal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(whiskey, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(drink, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(product, be cheap on snapdeal)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(product, cost more)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(product, be cheaper online than than store)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(brandy, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(bourbon, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(vodka, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(product, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(scotch, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(drink, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(scotch, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(whiskey, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(scotch, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(product, be cheap on snapdeal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(scotch, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(product, cost more) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(scotch, is expensive)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(product, be cheaper online than than store) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(scotch, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(drink, be expensive in restaurants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(scotch, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(vodka, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(vodka, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(bourbon, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(bourbon, is expensive)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(brandy, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(brandy, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(scotch, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(scotch, be more costly than port)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(scotch, be more costly than port)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scotch, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be cheaper online than than store)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(whiskey, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, cost more)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(product, be cheap on snapdeal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(bourbon, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(brandy, is expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(vodka, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drink, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(whiskey, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(product, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(drink, be expensive in restaurants)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(product, be cheaper online than than store)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(product, cost more)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(scotch, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(product, be cheap on snapdeal)