sea otter: be considered keystone species

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.76
, pacific ocean
Weight: 0.74
, animal
Weight: 0.74
, creature
Weight: 0.66
, species
Weight: 0.65
Siblings puffin
Weight: 0.52
, otter
Weight: 0.40
, sea lion
Weight: 0.40
, whale
Weight: 0.39
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered keystone species 1.00
is keystone species 0.98
is species 0.85
is endangered species 0.85
is endangered mammal 0.78
be become endangered 0.78
is endangered 0.77
be in endangered 0.77
is endangered animals 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(sea otter, be considered keystone species)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(species, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(species, is endangered)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(puffin, is endangered)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(otter, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(whale, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sea lion, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(sea lion, is keystone species)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(humpback whale, is endangered species)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(species, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(sea lion, is keystone species)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(sea lion, is keystone species)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(humpback whale, is endangered species)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(humpback whale, is endangered species)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sea lion, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(sea lion, is endangered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(humpback whale, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(humpback whale, is endangered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(whale, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(whale, is endangered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(otter, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(otter, is endangered)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(puffin, is endangered)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(puffin, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(sea otter, be considered keystone species)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(sea otter, is keystone species)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(sea otter, is keystone species)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(sea otter, is keystone species)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(sea otter, is species)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(sea otter, is species)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(sea otter, is species)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(sea otter, is endangered species)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sea otter, is endangered species)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sea otter, is endangered species)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, is keystone species)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(sea otter, is endangered mammal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(sea otter, be become endangered)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(sea otter, is endangered mammal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(sea otter, is endangered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(sea otter, be in endangered)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(sea otter, is endangered animals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(sea otter, is endangered mammal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(sea otter, be become endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(sea otter, be in endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(sea otter, is endangered)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(sea otter, is endangered animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sea otter, be become endangered)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sea otter, be in endangered)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(sea otter, is endangered)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(sea otter, is endangered animals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, is endangered species)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be become endangered)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be in endangered)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, is endangered)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, is species)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, is endangered mammal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, is endangered animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(sea otter, be considered keystone species)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(humpback whale, is endangered species)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(sea lion, is keystone species)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(puffin, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(humpback whale, is endangered)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sea lion, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(whale, is endangered)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(otter, is endangered)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(sea otter, be considered keystone species)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(species, is endangered)