seahorse: has physical part snouts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fish
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.68
, creature
Weight: 0.54
, sea
Weight: 0.52
, species
Weight: 0.48
Siblings sea otter
Weight: 0.37
, whale shark
Weight: 0.37
, dolphin
Weight: 0.37
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.37
, cassowary
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part snouts 1.00
have long snouts 0.96
has physical part tails 0.80
has physical part fins 0.76
has physical part tail 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(seahorse, has physical part snouts)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part tails)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(sea otter, has physical part tails)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(seahorse, has physical part snouts)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(sea otter, has physical part tails) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(sea otter, has physical part tails)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(seahorse, has physical part snouts)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(seahorse, have long snouts)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(seahorse, have long snouts)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, have long snouts)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(seahorse, has physical part tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(seahorse, has physical part tails)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part tails)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(seahorse, has physical part tail)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(seahorse, have long snouts)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(seahorse, has physical part tail)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part tail)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(seahorse, has physical part tails)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(seahorse, has physical part tail)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(seahorse, has physical part fins)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(seahorse, has physical part fins)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(seahorse, has physical part fins)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part fins)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part snouts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(seahorse, has physical part snouts)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(sea otter, has physical part tails)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(seahorse, has physical part snouts) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part tails)