sector: be popular in south africa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents segment
Weight: 0.62
, issue
Weight: 0.55
, factor
Weight: 0.54
, unit
Weight: 0.54
Siblings automobile industry
Weight: 0.76
, financial institution
Weight: 0.72
, oil company
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, industry
Weight: 0.70

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in south africa 1.00
be important in south africa 0.97
be popular in africa 0.95
be important in africa 0.91
be successful in northern italy 0.79
be in london expensive 0.77
be expensive in london 0.77
become in india 0.76
be such problem in america 0.76
is new england 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sector, be popular in south africa)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(issue, be such problem in america)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(industry, be successful in northern italy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in london expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(issue, be such problem in america)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(industry, be successful in northern italy)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(industry, be successful in northern italy)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(public transport, be in london expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in london)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(public transport, be expensive in london)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(sector, be popular in south africa)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(sector, be important in south africa)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(sector, be important in south africa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(sector, be important in south africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(sector, be popular in africa)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(sector, be popular in africa)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sector, be important in africa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(sector, be important in africa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(sector, be popular in africa)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(sector, be important in africa)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(sector, become in india)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(sector, become in india)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(sector, become in india)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sector, be important in south africa)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in africa)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(sector, is new england)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(sector, is new england)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sector, be important in africa)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sector, is new england)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(sector, is new england)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sector, become in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(sector, be popular in south africa)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(industry, be successful in northern italy)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(public transport, be in london expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(sector, be popular in south africa)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(issue, be such problem in america)