security system: is uk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.73
, security
Weight: 0.72
, service
Weight: 0.68
, device
Weight: 0.66
, personal computer
Weight: 0.65
Siblings access
Weight: 0.61
, alarm
Weight: 0.60
, adt
Weight: 0.54
, social security number
Weight: 0.37
, network device
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is uk 1.00
be bad in uk 0.95
be in india 0.81
be bad in singapore 0.79
is exe high cpu 0.77
be in london 0.77
become important in india 0.77
be bad in europe 0.76
go off in dallas tx 0.76
be bad in spain 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(service, be bad in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(security system, is uk)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(service, is exe high cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(security system, is uk)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, be bad in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(security system, is uk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(service, be bad in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(security system, is uk)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(service, be bad in spain) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(security system, is uk)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in uk)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(service, be in london)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in europe)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in spain)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in singapore)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in uk)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in spain)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in singapore)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in europe)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(alarm, go off in dallas tx)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(service, be bad in uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(security system, is uk)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, be bad in singapore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(security system, is uk)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(service, is exe high cpu) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(security system, is uk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(service, be bad in europe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(security system, is uk)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(security system, is uk)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(alarm, go off in dallas tx) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(alarm, go off in dallas tx)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(security system, is uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(security system, is uk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(security system, is uk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be in london)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, be bad in uk)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be bad in europe)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in spain)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(service, be bad in singapore)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(alarm, go off in dallas tx)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, be bad in uk)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be in london)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be bad in europe)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(service, be bad in singapore)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(security system, is uk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(service, be bad in spain)
...