service: be in london

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents escort service
Weight: 0.87
, postal service
Weight: 0.82
, honor
Weight: 0.62
, delivery
Weight: 0.58
Siblings service station
Weight: 0.85
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.83
, bar service
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, health insurance
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in london 1.00
be in london expensive 0.96
be expensive in london 0.96
be in nyc 0.82
be bad in europe 0.80
move around in england 0.79
be in chicago 0.79
be in boston 0.79
be in seattle 0.78
be expensive in sydney 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in seattle)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in london)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be in boston)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(public transport, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in london)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(public transport, be in london expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(public transport, be in seattle) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in seattle)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(public transport, be in boston) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(public transport, be in boston)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(public transport, be expensive in sydney) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(public transport, be expensive in sydney)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(service, be in london)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(service, move around in england)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(service, be bad in europe)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(service, be bad in europe)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(service, be bad in europe)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(service, move around in england)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(service, be bad in europe)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(service, move around in england)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(service, move around in england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(service, be in london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(public transport, be in london)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(public transport, be in seattle)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, be expensive in london)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(public transport, be in london expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(public transport, be expensive in sydney)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(service, be in london) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(public transport, be in boston)