security: be crucial in handling

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.66
, fundamental
Weight: 0.62
, job
Weight: 0.61
, solution
Weight: 0.61
Siblings security system
Weight: 0.72
, social security number
Weight: 0.68
, computer virus
Weight: 0.64
, treasury
Weight: 0.59
, police dog
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be crucial in handling 1.00
be handled 0.76
be crucial in incident response 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(security, be crucial in handling)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(security, be crucial in handling)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(security, be crucial in handling)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(security, be handled)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(security, be crucial in handling)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(security, be handled)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(security, be crucial in handling)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(security, be crucial in incident response)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(security, be crucial in handling)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(security, be handled)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(security, be crucial in handling)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(security, be crucial in incident response)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(security, be crucial in handling)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(security, be crucial in incident response)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(security, be crucial in handling)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(security, be handled)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(security, be crucial in handling)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(security, be crucial in incident response)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(security, be crucial in handling)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(security, be crucial in handling)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(security, be crucial in handling)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(security, be crucial in handling)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(security, be crucial in handling)