security: be important on internet

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.66
, fundamental
Weight: 0.62
, job
Weight: 0.61
, solution
Weight: 0.61
Siblings security system
Weight: 0.72
, social security number
Weight: 0.68
, computer virus
Weight: 0.64
, treasury
Weight: 0.59
, police dog
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
be on internet important 1.00
be important on internet 1.00
be important in wirless network 0.79
be important in network 0.79
be important in wireless networks 0.77
be important in networks 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(security, be important on internet)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(security, be on internet important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(security, be on internet important)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(security, be important in wirless network)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(security, be important in wirless network)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(security, be on internet important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(security, be important in wirless network)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(security, be important in wirless network)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(security, be important in wireless networks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(security, be important in wireless networks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(security, be important in wireless networks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(security, be important in wireless networks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(security, be on internet important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(security, be important on internet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(security, be important on internet)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(security, be important on internet)