seeing: has quality news

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents experience
Weight: 0.50
, term
Weight: 0.49
, function
Weight: 0.49
, characteristic
Weight: 0.48
, activity
Weight: 0.45
Siblings thinking
Weight: 0.30
, business activity
Weight: 0.30
, sight
Weight: 0.30
, like
Weight: 0.30
, feel
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality news 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
show up in news feed 0.80
has quality good 0.79
has quality change 0.76
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(seeing, has quality news)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(seeing, has quality news)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(seeing, has quality news)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(seeing, has quality news)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(experience, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(characteristic, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality better)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(thinking, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(thinking, has quality change)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(feel, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(like, show up in news feed)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(sight, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(sight, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(thinking, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(experience, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(experience, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(characteristic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(experience, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(seeing, has quality news)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(feel, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(feel, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(thinking, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(thinking, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(thinking, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(thinking, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(sight, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(sight, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(thinking, has quality change)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(thinking, has quality change)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(like, show up in news feed)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(like, show up in news feed)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(sight, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(sight, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(seeing, has quality news)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(seeing, has quality news)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(thinking, has quality change)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(feel, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(thinking, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(sight, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sight, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(thinking, has quality good)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(like, show up in news feed)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(characteristic, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(experience, has quality better)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(seeing, has quality news)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(experience, has quality good)