seeing: is bad luck

Related concepts

Parents	experience Weight: 0.50 , term Weight: 0.49 , function Weight: 0.49 , characteristic Weight: 0.48 , activity Weight: 0.45
Siblings	thinking Weight: 0.30 , business activity Weight: 0.30 , sight Weight: 0.30 , like Weight: 0.30 , feel Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is bad luck	1.00
is good luck	0.98
has state luck	0.93
good	0.79
is unlucky	0.79
has quality bad	0.76
good for guys	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(experience, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(seeing, is bad luck)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(experience, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(experience, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(thinking, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(feel, good)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Remarkable(feel, good for guys)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(experience, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(seeing, is bad luck)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(feel, good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Plausible(feel, good)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

Remarkable(feel, good for guys) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(feel, good for guys)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(business activity, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(business activity, has quality bad)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(thinking, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(thinking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(seeing, is bad luck)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(seeing, is good luck)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Typical(seeing, has state luck)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(seeing, is good luck)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(seeing, is unlucky)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(seeing, is good luck)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(seeing, is unlucky)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(seeing, has state luck)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(seeing, is unlucky)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.30

Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(seeing, has state luck)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(seeing, is good luck)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(seeing, is unlucky)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(seeing, has state luck)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Salient(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.52

Plausible(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(seeing, is bad luck)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(feel, good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Typical(feel, good for guys)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Typical(thinking, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Typical(business activity, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.72

Typical(seeing, is bad luck) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(experience, has quality bad)