segregation: was enforced in south

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents evil
Weight: 0.61
, policy
Weight: 0.60
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.56
Siblings slavery
Weight: 0.34
, inequality
Weight: 0.34
, apartheid
Weight: 0.34
, bigotry
Weight: 0.34
, assimilation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was enforced in south 1.00
was instituted in south 0.81
was different in north 0.79
was practiced in southern states 0.78
was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following civil war 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(segregation, was enforced in south)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(segregation, was instituted in south)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(segregation, was different in north)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(segregation, was practiced in southern states)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following civil war)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(segregation, was different in north)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(segregation, was instituted in south)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was practiced in southern states)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(segregation, was practiced in southern states)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(segregation, was different in north)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was instituted in south)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following civil war)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following civil war)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was different in north)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(segregation, was instituted in south)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced in southern states)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(segregation, was practiced despite passage of amendments prohibiting following civil war)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(segregation, was enforced in south)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(segregation, was enforced in south)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(segregation, was enforced in south)