segway: be illegal in australia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scooter
Weight: 0.56
, vehicle
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.53
, device
Weight: 0.44
, option
Weight: 0.42
Siblings bicycle
Weight: 0.32
, bike
Weight: 0.32
, motor vehicle
Weight: 0.32
, motorcycle
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be illegal in australia 1.00
be illegal in uk 0.89
is illegal 0.79
uk 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(scooter, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(segway, be illegal in australia)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(option, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(segway, be illegal in australia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(option, is illegal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(scooter, is illegal)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(option, is illegal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(scooter, is illegal)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.21
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(scooter, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(segway, be illegal in australia)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(option, is illegal)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(segway, be illegal in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(segway, be illegal in australia)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(segway, be illegal in uk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(segway, uk)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(segway, uk)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(segway, is illegal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(segway, be illegal in uk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(segway, uk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(segway, is illegal)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(segway, be illegal in uk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(segway, be illegal in uk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(segway, is illegal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(segway, is illegal)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(segway, uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(segway, be illegal in australia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(segway, be illegal in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(option, is illegal)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(scooter, is illegal)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(option, is illegal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(segway, be illegal in australia)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(scooter, is illegal)