senior: be vulnerable to fire

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents veteran
Weight: 0.62
, group
Weight: 0.59
, division
Weight: 0.55
, leader
Weight: 0.54
, high school
Weight: 0.54
Siblings junior
Weight: 0.59
, leadership
Weight: 0.31
, committee
Weight: 0.31
, functional group
Weight: 0.31
, school district
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vulnerable to fire 1.00
is vulnerable population 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(veteran, is vulnerable population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(senior, be vulnerable to fire)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(senior, be vulnerable to fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(veteran, is vulnerable population)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(senior, be vulnerable to fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(veteran, is vulnerable population)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(veteran, is vulnerable population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(senior, be vulnerable to fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(senior, be vulnerable to fire)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(senior, be vulnerable to fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(senior, be vulnerable to fire)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(senior, be vulnerable to fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(senior, is vulnerable population)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(senior, be vulnerable to fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(senior, is vulnerable population)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(senior, be vulnerable to fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(senior, is vulnerable population)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(senior, be vulnerable to fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(senior, is vulnerable population)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(senior, be vulnerable to fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(senior, be vulnerable to fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(senior, be vulnerable to fire)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(senior, be vulnerable to fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(senior, be vulnerable to fire)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(senior, be vulnerable to fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(veteran, is vulnerable population)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(senior, be vulnerable to fire) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(veteran, is vulnerable population)