servant: were treated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents worker
Weight: 0.60
, honor
Weight: 0.59
, relation
Weight: 0.59
, slave
Weight: 0.59
Siblings butler
Weight: 0.67
, steward
Weight: 0.67
, maid
Weight: 0.61
, guard
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated 1.00
were treated during time period 1199 1300 0.84
were affected in 1920s 0.76
were transported from one county 0.76
were treated on auction blocks 0.76
were treated during slave trade 0.76
were treated during apartheid 0.75
were treated in triangular trade 0.75
were mistreated 0.75
were transported by ship 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(slave, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(servant, were treated)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(servant, were treated)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(slave, were mistreated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(servant, were treated)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(slave, were treated)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(slave, were mistreated)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(worker, were affected in 1920s)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(worker, were affected in 1920s)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(slave, were treated)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(slave, were mistreated)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(slave, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(servant, were treated)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(worker, were affected in 1920s) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(servant, were treated)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(slave, were mistreated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(servant, were treated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(servant, were treated)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(servant, were treated during time period 1199 1300)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(servant, were treated during apartheid)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(servant, were treated during time period 1199 1300)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(servant, were treated during apartheid)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(servant, were treated during time period 1199 1300)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(servant, were treated during apartheid)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(servant, were treated during apartheid)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(servant, were treated during time period 1199 1300)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(servant, were treated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(servant, were treated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(slave, were treated)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(slave, were mistreated)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(worker, were affected in 1920s)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(slave, were treated)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(slave, were mistreated)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(servant, were treated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(worker, were affected in 1920s)