service: be more variable than goods

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents escort service
Weight: 0.87
, postal service
Weight: 0.82
, honor
Weight: 0.62
, delivery
Weight: 0.58
Siblings service station
Weight: 0.85
, internet service provider
Weight: 0.83
, bar service
Weight: 0.72
, public transport
Weight: 0.71
, health insurance
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more variable than goods 1.00
differ from goods marketing 0.80
be more expensive for less 0.78
be more expensive for less now 0.77
be more expensive in areas 0.77
be better than cars 0.76
be cheaper than huawei 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(honor, be cheaper than huawei)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(service, be more variable than goods)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(honor, be cheaper than huawei)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(honor, be cheaper than huawei)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in areas)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(honor, be cheaper than huawei)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(service, be more variable than goods)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(health insurance, be more expensive in areas)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(health insurance, be more expensive in areas)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(public transport, be better than cars)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(public transport, be better than cars)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(service, be more variable than goods)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(service, differ from goods marketing)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(service, differ from goods marketing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(service, differ from goods marketing)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(service, differ from goods marketing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(service, be more variable than goods)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(service, be more variable than goods)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(honor, be cheaper than huawei)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(health insurance, be more expensive in areas)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(public transport, be better than cars)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(service, be more variable than goods)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(honor, be cheaper than huawei)