set: have names

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents setting
Weight: 0.70
, option
Weight: 0.59
, concept
Weight: 0.59
, challenge
Weight: 0.59
Siblings empty set
Weight: 0.65
, ordinal number
Weight: 0.48
, mirage
Weight: 0.46
, lock
Weight: 0.31
, put
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
have names 1.00
have similar names 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(set, have names)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(set, have names)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(set, have names)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(set, have similar names)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(set, have names)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(set, have similar names)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(set, have names)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(set, have similar names)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(set, have names)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(set, have similar names)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(set, have names)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(set, have names)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(set, have names)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(set, have names)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(set, have names)