sewing machine: were computerized

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents equipment
Weight: 0.69
, machine
Weight: 0.68
, device
Weight: 0.66
, machinery
Weight: 0.65
Siblings fax machine
Weight: 0.37
, time machine
Weight: 0.37
, mri machine
Weight: 0.36
, lathe
Weight: 0.36
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
were computerized 1.00
be important to computer system 0.79
be different from machines 0.76
be called simple machines 0.76
be important to electronic technician 0.76
be called machines 0.75
be different from other machines 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(equipment, be important to electronic technician) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sewing machine, were computerized)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(machine, be called simple machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sewing machine, were computerized)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(machine, be different from other machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sewing machine, were computerized)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sewing machine, were computerized)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(machine, be called machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sewing machine, were computerized)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(device, be important to computer system)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(machine, be called machines)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(machine, be different from other machines)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(machine, be called simple machines)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(equipment, be important to electronic technician)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(equipment, be important to electronic technician)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(machine, be called simple machines)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(machine, be different from other machines)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(machine, be called machines)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sewing machine, were computerized)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(equipment, be important to electronic technician) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sewing machine, were computerized)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(machine, be called simple machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sewing machine, were computerized)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(machine, be different from other machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sewing machine, were computerized)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(machine, be called machines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(sewing machine, were computerized)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(sewing machine, were computerized)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(sewing machine, were computerized)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(equipment, be important to electronic technician)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(machine, be called machines)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(machine, be different from other machines)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(machine, be called simple machines)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(equipment, be important to electronic technician)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(machine, be called machines)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(machine, be different from other machines)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(sewing machine, were computerized) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(machine, be called simple machines)