device: be important to computer system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.79
, network device
Weight: 0.78
, tablet computer
Weight: 0.77
, cartridge
Weight: 0.66
Siblings laptop computer
Weight: 0.78
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.75
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.75
, computer monitor
Weight: 0.74
, hypodermic needle
Weight: 0.72

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to computer system 1.00
be connected to computer 0.85
be better than computers 0.83
need systems 0.82
be more expensive than desktop computers with power 0.82
be more expensive than desktop computers 0.82
be recognized on computer networks 0.81
cost more than desktop computers 0.80
be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power 0.78
need operating systems 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet computer, be better than computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(electronic device, need operating systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(electronic device, need systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(electronic device, need systems)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(tablet computer, be better than computers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(electronic device, need operating systems)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tablet computer, be better than computers)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, need operating systems)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, need systems)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(tablet computer, be better than computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(device, be important to computer system)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(electronic device, need systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(device, be important to computer system)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(electronic device, need operating systems) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(device, be important to computer system)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(device, be important to computer system)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(device, be connected to computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(device, be connected to computer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(device, be connected to computer)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(device, need operating systems)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(device, need operating systems)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(device, need operating systems)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(device, be recognized on computer networks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(device, need operating systems)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be important to computer system)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(electronic device, need systems)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(electronic device, need operating systems)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tablet computer, be better than computers)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(laptop computer, cost more than desktop computers)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with power)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desktop computers with comparable power)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(electronic device, need systems)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(tablet computer, be better than computers)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(device, be important to computer system) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(electronic device, need operating systems)