sex: has quality sin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sexual activity
Weight: 0.68
, subject
Weight: 0.64
, taboo
Weight: 0.64
, tv show
Weight: 0.63
Siblings sexual intercourse
Weight: 0.72
, escort service
Weight: 0.55
, indecent exposure
Weight: 0.54
, blowjob
Weight: 0.52
, transgender
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality sin 1.00
be considered sin 0.92
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(indecent exposure, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(indecent exposure, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sex, has quality sin)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sex, be considered sin)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(sex, be considered sin)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sex, be considered sin)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sex, be considered sin)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sex, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(sex, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(sex, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sex, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sex, has quality sin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sex, has quality sin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(sex, has quality sin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(indecent exposure, has quality bad)