shake: is less expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, ice cream
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.51
, show
Weight: 0.50
Siblings rattle
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.32
, rip
Weight: 0.32
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.32
, nail polish
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is less expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.92
be cheaper than nug 0.89
is cheaper 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(shake, is less expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(shake, is less expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(nail polish, is expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(nail polish, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(shake, is less expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(shake, be cheaper than nug)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(shake, be cheaper than nug)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(shake, is expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(shake, is cheaper)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(shake, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(shake, is expensive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(shake, is cheaper)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(shake, is cheaper)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(shake, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(shake, is cheaper)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shake, is less expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(shake, is less expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nail polish, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(shake, is less expensive) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)