shake: be cheaper than nug

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hit
Weight: 0.60
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, ice cream
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.51
, show
Weight: 0.50
Siblings rattle
Weight: 0.32
, big bang
Weight: 0.32
, rip
Weight: 0.32
, big bang theory
Weight: 0.32
, nail polish
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than nug 1.00
is cheaper 0.97
is less expensive 0.89
is expensive 0.84
is cheap 0.79
be cheaper than bud 0.78
has quality better 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(shake, be cheaper than nug)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(thing, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(nail polish, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(rip, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(thing, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(nail polish, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(nail polish, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(rip, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(rip, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(shake, be cheaper than nug)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than bud)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shake, is less expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(shake, be cheaper than bud)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(shake, be cheaper than bud)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(shake, is cheaper)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(shake, be cheaper than bud)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(shake, is less expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(shake, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(shake, is cheaper)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(shake, is less expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(shake, is less expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(shake, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shake, is cheap)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(shake, is cheap)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shake, has quality better)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shake, has quality better)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(shake, is cheaper)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(shake, is cheaper)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(shake, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(shake, is expensive)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shake, has quality better)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(shake, is cheap)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(shake, is cheap)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(shake, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(shake, be cheaper than nug)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(nail polish, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(rip, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(shake, be cheaper than nug)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(thing, is expensive)