shallot: has quality better

Related concepts

Parents	onion Weight: 0.55 , vegetable Weight: 0.51 , garlic Weight: 0.50 , dish Weight: 0.50 , ingredient Weight: 0.49
Siblings	tomato sauce Weight: 0.36 , eggplant Weight: 0.35 , parsley Weight: 0.35 , cauliflower Weight: 0.35 , chard Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality better	1.00
has quality good	0.94
has quality worth	0.83
be better than eating	0.76
is best	0.76
is better next day	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(onion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(shallot, has quality better)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(garlic, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(shallot, has quality better)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(shallot, has quality better)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(vegetable, be better than eating) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(shallot, has quality better)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Plausible(garlic, has quality good)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(onion, has quality good)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(vegetable, be better than eating)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(onion, has quality good)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality good)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(vegetable, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(vegetable, be better than eating)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, is better next day)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(onion, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(shallot, has quality better)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.92

Plausible(garlic, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(shallot, has quality better)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.79

Plausible(vegetable, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(shallot, has quality better)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

Plausible(vegetable, be better than eating) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Plausible(shallot, has quality better)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality good)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(tomato sauce, is better next day) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, is better next day)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Salient(shallot, has quality better)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(shallot, has quality good)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(shallot, has quality good)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(shallot, has quality good)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(shallot, has quality worth)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(shallot, has quality worth)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(shallot, has quality worth)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.89

Salient(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.83

Plausible(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(shallot, has quality better)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(vegetable, be better than eating)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(garlic, has quality good)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(onion, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(tomato sauce, is better next day)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(garlic, has quality good)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(onion, has quality good)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.89

Typical(shallot, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(vegetable, be better than eating)