shallot: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents onion
Weight: 0.55
, vegetable
Weight: 0.51
, garlic
Weight: 0.50
, dish
Weight: 0.50
, ingredient
Weight: 0.49
Siblings tomato sauce
Weight: 0.36
, eggplant
Weight: 0.35
, parsley
Weight: 0.35
, cauliflower
Weight: 0.35
, chard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality better 0.94
has quality worth 0.85
is strong nowadays 0.77
is best 0.76
be good for earth 0.75
be good for bad breath 0.75
be healthy for us 0.75
be bad company work for 0.75
be good for heart 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(onion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shallot, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(garlic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shallot, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shallot, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shallot, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(garlic, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(onion, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(onion, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(dish, be bad company work for)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(garlic, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(parsley, be good for bad breath)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(onion, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(garlic, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(vegetable, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(dish, be bad company work for)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shallot, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cauliflower, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(tomato sauce, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(tomato sauce, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(parsley, be good for bad breath)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(parsley, be good for bad breath)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(shallot, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(shallot, has quality better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(shallot, has quality better)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(shallot, has quality better)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(shallot, has quality worth)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(shallot, has quality worth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(shallot, has quality worth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(shallot, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality good)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(onion, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(parsley, be good for bad breath)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cauliflower, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(tomato sauce, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(vegetable, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(garlic, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(onion, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(shallot, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dish, be bad company work for)