shampoo: be more common than solid shampoo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents toiletry
Weight: 0.65
, detergent
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.60
, gel
Weight: 0.60
, soap
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hair gel
Weight: 0.36
, deodorant
Weight: 0.36
, lotion
Weight: 0.36
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.35
, hair spray
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more common than solid shampoo 1.00
be called shampoo 0.87
be good for skin 0.77
be better than powder 0.77
make skin softer 0.76
be less effective in hard water 0.76
be made from detergents 0.76
be bad for skin 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(detergent, be better than powder)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(detergent, be better than powder)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(detergent, be better than powder)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(soap, be less effective in hard water)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lotion, make skin softer)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(deodorant, be bad for skin)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(detergent, be better than powder)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(soap, be less effective in hard water)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(lotion, make skin softer)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(lotion, make skin softer)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(deodorant, be bad for skin)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(deodorant, be bad for skin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(shampoo, be called shampoo)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be called shampoo)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(shampoo, be made from detergents)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(shampoo, be made from detergents)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(shampoo, be made from detergents)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(shampoo, be called shampoo)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be made from detergents)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be called shampoo)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(soap, be less effective in hard water)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(detergent, be better than powder)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(lotion, make skin softer)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(deodorant, be bad for skin)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(soap, be less effective in hard water)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.77
Typical(shampoo, be more common than solid shampoo)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(detergent, be better than powder)