shape: be important to protein function

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.60
, quality
Weight: 0.60
, part
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hourglass
Weight: 0.66
, candy cane
Weight: 0.65
, sphere
Weight: 0.64
, spiral
Weight: 0.63
, straight line
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to protein function 1.00
be important to proteins 0.90
be important to molecule 0.85
has quality function 0.81
be related to genes 0.80
be important to cell 0.78
be controlled by many different genes 0.77
be controlled by different genes 0.77
controlled by genes 0.77
have many different phenotypes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(trait, be related to genes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shape, be important to protein function)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(trait, have many different phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shape, be important to protein function)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(trait, have many different phenotypes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(trait, be related to genes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(trait, be related to genes)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(trait, have many different phenotypes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(trait, be related to genes)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(shape, be important to protein function)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(trait, have many different phenotypes)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(shape, be important to protein function)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(straight line, has quality function)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(straight line, has quality function)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(shape, be important to protein function)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(shape, be important to proteins)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(shape, be important to molecule)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(shape, be important to proteins)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(shape, be important to cell)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(shape, be important to molecule)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(shape, be important to proteins)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(shape, be important to proteins)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(shape, be important to cell)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(shape, be important to molecule)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(shape, be important to molecule)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(shape, be important to cell)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(shape, be important to cell)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shape, be important to protein function)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shape, be important to protein function)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(trait, have many different phenotypes)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(trait, be related to genes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(straight line, has quality function)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(trait, have many different phenotypes)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(shape, be important to protein function)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(trait, be related to genes)