shareholder: have important rights

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents investor
Weight: 0.72
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, owner
Weight: 0.62
, third party
Weight: 0.59
, term
Weight: 0.57
Siblings mortgage lender
Weight: 0.34
, bondholder
Weight: 0.33
, venture capitalist
Weight: 0.33
, employee
Weight: 0.32
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have important rights 1.00
has physical part rights 0.91
be important in organisation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, have important rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(shareholder, have important rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(employee, be important in organisation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(shareholder, have important rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(shareholder, have important rights)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(shareholder, have important rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(shareholder, has physical part rights)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(shareholder, have important rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(shareholder, has physical part rights)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(shareholder, have important rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(shareholder, has physical part rights)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(shareholder, have important rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, has physical part rights)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(shareholder, have important rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(shareholder, have important rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, have important rights)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(shareholder, have important rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(shareholder, have important rights)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, have important rights) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important in organisation)