employee: be important in organisation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, partner
Weight: 0.65
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in organisation 1.00
is well important 0.88
be important in business 0.84
be important to business 0.82
be important in organization 0.79
be important to organization 0.77
be important to company 0.77
be important to success 0.77
be important to success of organisation 0.77
is difficult 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(partner, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important in organisation)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important in organisation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(creditor, be important to business)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(partner, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(partner, be important in business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(partner, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(employee, be important in organisation)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(creditor, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(employee, be important in organisation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(employee, be important in organisation)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to business)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organization)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to success of organisation)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(employee, be important to business)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to organization)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to company)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(employee, be important to business)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(employee, be important in organization)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(employee, be important to company)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to business)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(employee, be important to organization)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(employee, be important to success of organisation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(employee, be important to company)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to company)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important to organization)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to organization)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(employee, be important in organization)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(employee, be important in organization)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(employee, be important to success of organisation)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(employee, be important to success of organisation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(employee, be important in organisation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(employee, be important in organisation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)