employee: be important to company

Related concepts

Parents	other person Weight: 0.69 , partner Weight: 0.65 , creditor Weight: 0.64 , officer Weight: 0.63
Siblings	office worker Weight: 0.74 , construction worker Weight: 0.74 , salesperson Weight: 0.70 , receptionist Weight: 0.69 , waiter Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important to company	1.00
be part of company	0.93
help company	0.89
be important in business	0.84
be important to business	0.84
leave company	0.84
stay in company	0.84
be important to businesses	0.79
be important in organisation	0.77
be to business	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(partner, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(employee, be important to company)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(partner, be to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(employee, be important to company)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(creditor, be important to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(employee, be important to company)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(creditor, be important to business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(partner, be to business)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(partner, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(partner, be important in business)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(partner, be to business)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(creditor, be important to business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(partner, be important in business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(employee, be important to company)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.24

Plausible(creditor, be important to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(employee, be important to company)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(partner, be to business) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(employee, be important to company)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Salient(employee, be important to company)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(employee, be part of company)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(employee, be part of company)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(employee, stay in company)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(employee, be part of company)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(employee, stay in company)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to business)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(employee, be part of company)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(employee, stay in company)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to businesses)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(employee, stay in company)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(employee, be important in organisation)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(employee, be important to business)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Typical(employee, be important to business)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(employee, be important to business)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Salient(employee, be important to businesses)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(employee, be important in organisation)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(employee, be important to businesses)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(employee, be important in organisation)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(employee, be important to businesses)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(employee, be important in organisation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Salient(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.55

Plausible(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(employee, be important to company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(partner, be to business)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(creditor, be important to business)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(partner, be to business)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(employee, be important to company) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(partner, be important in business)