shark: has physical part teeth

Related concepts

Parents	creature Weight: 0.74 , tiger shark Weight: 0.73 , predator Weight: 0.67 , fish Weight: 0.63 , animal Weight: 0.62
Siblings	whale shark Weight: 0.84 , bull shark Weight: 0.83 , great white shark Weight: 0.79 , hammerhead shark Weight: 0.76 , manta ray Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has physical part teeth	1.00
has teeth	0.93
have croocked teeth	0.92
have many teeth	0.89
have number of teeth	0.88
has sharp teeth	0.86
have sharp teeth	0.86
has physical part jaw	0.85
be born with teeth	0.84
have 3 layers of teeth	0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(predator, have sharp teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(shark, has physical part teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Plausible(predator, have sharp teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Remarkable(predator, have sharp teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Remarkable(great white shark, has physical part teeth)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(whale shark, has physical part teeth)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.42

Plausible(predator, have sharp teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(shark, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

Remarkable(great white shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(great white shark, has physical part teeth)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(whale shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(whale shark, has physical part teeth)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(great white shark, have sharp teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(shark, has physical part teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(shark, have sharp teeth)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Salient(shark, have sharp teeth)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(shark, have sharp teeth)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(shark, have sharp teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

Salient(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.27

Plausible(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(shark, has physical part teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(predator, have sharp teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(great white shark, has physical part teeth)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(whale shark, has physical part teeth)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(great white shark, have sharp teeth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(shark, has physical part teeth) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(predator, have sharp teeth)