sherpa: mountaineering teams

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents climber
Weight: 0.49
, expedition
Weight: 0.41
, guide
Weight: 0.33
, team
Weight: 0.32
, material
Weight: 0.32
Siblings trip
Weight: 0.27
, nasturtium
Weight: 0.26
, ivy
Weight: 0.26
, basketball team
Weight: 0.25
, football team
Weight: 0.25

Related properties

Property Similarity
mountaineering teams 1.00
is climbers 0.85
is better climbers 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(sherpa, mountaineering teams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(sherpa, mountaineering teams)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(sherpa, mountaineering teams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(sherpa, is climbers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sherpa, mountaineering teams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(sherpa, is climbers)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(sherpa, mountaineering teams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sherpa, is better climbers)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(sherpa, mountaineering teams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(sherpa, is climbers)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(sherpa, mountaineering teams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(sherpa, is climbers)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sherpa, mountaineering teams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(sherpa, is better climbers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(sherpa, mountaineering teams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(sherpa, is better climbers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(sherpa, mountaineering teams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(sherpa, is better climbers)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(sherpa, mountaineering teams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sherpa, mountaineering teams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(sherpa, mountaineering teams)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(sherpa, mountaineering teams) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(sherpa, mountaineering teams)