shigella: has state problem

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pathogen
Weight: 0.44
, parasite
Weight: 0.37
, example
Weight: 0.16
Siblings staphylococcus
Weight: 0.33
, salmonella
Weight: 0.32
, clostridium perfringens
Weight: 0.32
, fungus
Weight: 0.31
, influenza
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state problem 1.00
has state concern 0.84
is health issue 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state problem)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(salmonella, has state problem)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(influenza, is health issue)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(salmonella, is health issue)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(salmonella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(salmonella, has state problem)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(influenza, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state problem)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(salmonella, is health issue)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(salmonella, is health issue)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(influenza, is health issue)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(influenza, is health issue)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(influenza, has state concern)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(influenza, has state concern)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(shigella, has state problem)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shigella, has state problem)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(shigella, has state problem)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(salmonella, is health issue)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(salmonella, has state problem)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(influenza, is health issue)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(influenza, has state problem)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(shigella, has state problem)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(influenza, has state concern)