shoe: be at front porch

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents object
Weight: 0.63
, piece
Weight: 0.62
, gift
Weight: 0.60
, toy
Weight: 0.60
Siblings oxford
Weight: 0.64
, sneaker
Weight: 0.62
, clog
Weight: 0.59
, heel
Weight: 0.56
, puma
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at front porch 1.00
be at porch 0.96
be at front door 0.84
be at back of sofa 0.77
fall inside or outside frame 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(toy, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shoe, be at front porch)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(object, fall inside or outside frame) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shoe, be at front porch)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(object, fall inside or outside frame)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(toy, be at back of sofa)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(toy, be at back of sofa)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(object, fall inside or outside frame)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sneaker, be at front porch)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(toy, be at back of sofa) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(shoe, be at front porch)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(object, fall inside or outside frame) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(shoe, be at front porch)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(sneaker, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(sneaker, be at front porch)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(shoe, be at front porch)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at porch)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(shoe, be at porch)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(shoe, be at porch)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(shoe, be at porch)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(shoe, be at front door)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(shoe, be at front door)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at front door)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(shoe, be at front door)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at front porch)

Typical implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(shoe, be at front porch)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(toy, be at back of sofa)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(object, fall inside or outside frame)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(sneaker, be at front porch)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(toy, be at back of sofa)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(shoe, be at front porch) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(object, fall inside or outside frame)