short: cost as pants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.56
, player
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.54
Siblings long hair
Weight: 0.32
, only
Weight: 0.32
, bad breath
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
cost as pants 1.00
is pants 0.91
cost as jeans 0.90
be same price as pants 0.90
be more expensive than pants 0.90
have underwear 0.77
have underwear in them 0.77
cost same 0.77
be called shorts 0.76
have built in underwear 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(short, cost as pants)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(short, be same price as pants)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(short, be same price as pants)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(short, be same price as pants)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(short, be more expensive than pants)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(short, be more expensive than pants)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(short, be more expensive than pants)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(short, cost as jeans)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(short, cost as jeans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(short, cost as jeans)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(short, be same price as pants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(short, be more expensive than pants)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(short, is pants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(short, is pants)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(short, cost as jeans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(short, is pants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(short, have built in underwear)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(short, cost same)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(short, have built in underwear)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(short, have underwear in them)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(short, have built in underwear)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(short, have underwear in them)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(short, have underwear in them)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(short, cost same)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(short, is pants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(short, have underwear)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(short, have underwear)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(short, cost same)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(short, cost same)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(short, be called shorts)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(short, have underwear)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(short, be called shorts)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(short, have built in underwear)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(short, be called shorts)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(short, have underwear in them)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(short, have underwear)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(short, be called shorts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(short, cost as pants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(short, cost as pants) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(short, cost as pants)