short: be same price as pants

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.58
, material
Weight: 0.56
, player
Weight: 0.56
, process
Weight: 0.54
Siblings long hair
Weight: 0.32
, only
Weight: 0.32
, bad breath
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be same price as pants 1.00
cost as pants 0.90
is same price 0.86
is pants 0.86
be more expensive than pants 0.84
cost as jeans 0.84
has quality price 0.80
push down stock price 0.80
have underwear in them 0.78
have underwear 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(short, be same price as pants)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(short, be more expensive than pants)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(short, push down stock price)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(short, push down stock price)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(short, push down stock price)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(short, is same price)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(short, is same price)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(short, be more expensive than pants)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(short, is same price)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(short, be more expensive than pants)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(short, cost as jeans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(short, cost as jeans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(short, cost as jeans)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(short, cost as pants)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(short, push down stock price)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(short, have underwear in them)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(short, cost as pants)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(short, is pants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(short, have underwear in them)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(short, have underwear in them)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(short, is pants)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(short, have underwear)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(short, be more expensive than pants)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(short, is same price)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(short, have underwear)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(short, cost as pants)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(short, have underwear)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(short, is pants)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(short, cost as jeans)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(short, has quality price)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(short, has quality price)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(short, has quality price)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(short, cost as pants)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(short, is pants)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(short, have underwear in them)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(short, have underwear)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(short, has quality price)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(short, be same price as pants)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(short, be same price as pants)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(short, be same price as pants)