shrew: has physical part noses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.64
, species
Weight: 0.63
, mammal
Weight: 0.58
, play
Weight: 0.56
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.34
, fox
Weight: 0.34
, squirrel
Weight: 0.34
, owl
Weight: 0.34
, cougar
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part noses 1.00
have long noses 0.92
has physical part teeth 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(arctic fox, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(arctic fox, has physical part noses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(shrew, has physical part noses)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(shrew, has physical part teeth)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(shrew, has physical part teeth)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(shrew, have long noses)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(shrew, has physical part teeth)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(shrew, has physical part teeth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(shrew, have long noses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(shrew, have long noses)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(shrew, have long noses)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(shrew, has physical part noses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(shrew, has physical part noses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(shrew, has physical part noses) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(arctic fox, has physical part noses)