shrimp: be bad for gout

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seafood
Weight: 0.72
, shellfish
Weight: 0.70
, bait
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.65
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.60
Siblings lobster
Weight: 0.39
, crab
Weight: 0.38
, oyster
Weight: 0.38
, crawfish
Weight: 0.37
, mackerel
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for gout 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(shellfish, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(shrimp, be bad for gout)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(seafood, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(shrimp, be bad for gout)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(seafood, be bad for gout)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(shellfish, be bad for gout)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(seafood, be bad for gout)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(shellfish, be bad for gout)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(shellfish, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be bad for gout)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(seafood, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(shrimp, be bad for gout)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(shrimp, be bad for gout)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Salient(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for gout)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(shrimp, be bad for gout)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(seafood, be bad for gout)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(shellfish, be bad for gout)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(seafood, be bad for gout)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(shrimp, be bad for gout) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(shellfish, be bad for gout)