shunt: be connected in parallel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.43
, example
Weight: 0.41
, structure
Weight: 0.41
, method
Weight: 0.38
Siblings implant
Weight: 0.30
, valve
Weight: 0.30
, pacemaker
Weight: 0.30
, vacuum tube
Weight: 0.30
, cooling device
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
be connected in parallel 1.00
be connected to computer 0.80
be charged via connection 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(shunt, be connected in parallel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shunt, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(device, be connected to computer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(device, be connected to computer)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(device, be connected to computer)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(shunt, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(shunt, be connected in parallel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shunt, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(shunt, be connected in parallel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(shunt, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(shunt, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, be connected in parallel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(shunt, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(shunt, be connected in parallel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(shunt, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(device, be connected to computer)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(shunt, be connected in parallel)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(device, be connected to computer)