sibling: is best looking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents relationship
Weight: 0.63
, child
Weight: 0.63
, relative
Weight: 0.60
, person
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sister
Weight: 0.35
, daughter
Weight: 0.34
, parent
Weight: 0.34
, uncle
Weight: 0.33
, boy
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best looking 1.00
look better 0.82
look different 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(sister, look different)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(sister, look different)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(sister, look different)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(sibling, is best looking)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sibling, look different)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(sibling, look different)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(sibling, look better)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sibling, look different)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sibling, look different)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sibling, look different)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sibling, look different)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(sibling, look better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(sibling, look better)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(sibling, look different)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sibling, look different)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(sibling, look better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sibling, is best looking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(sibling, is best looking)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(sibling, is best looking)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(sister, look different)