side: be for steak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, structure
Weight: 0.60
, direction
Weight: 0.59
, shape
Weight: 0.58
Siblings back
Weight: 0.63
, coleslaw
Weight: 0.59
, front
Weight: 0.57
, mountain pass
Weight: 0.46
, trapezium
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for steak 1.00
be with steak 0.99
be called coleslaw 0.79
is spicy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(coleslaw, be called coleslaw)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(coleslaw, is spicy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(coleslaw, be called coleslaw) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(coleslaw, be called coleslaw)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(coleslaw, is spicy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(coleslaw, is spicy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(side, be for steak)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(side, be with steak)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(side, be with steak)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(side, be with steak)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(side, be with steak)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(side, be for steak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(side, be for steak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(coleslaw, be called coleslaw)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(side, be for steak) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(coleslaw, is spicy)