side: be with steak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.63
, structure
Weight: 0.60
, direction
Weight: 0.59
, shape
Weight: 0.58
Siblings back
Weight: 0.63
, coleslaw
Weight: 0.59
, front
Weight: 0.57
, mountain pass
Weight: 0.46
, trapezium
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with steak 1.00
be for steak 0.99
be called coleslaw 0.79
is spicy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(coleslaw, be called coleslaw)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(coleslaw, is spicy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(coleslaw, be called coleslaw)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(coleslaw, be called coleslaw)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(coleslaw, is spicy)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(coleslaw, is spicy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(side, be with steak)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(side, be for steak)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(side, be for steak)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(side, be for steak)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(side, be for steak)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(side, be with steak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(side, be with steak)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(coleslaw, be called coleslaw)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(side, be with steak)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(coleslaw, is spicy)