sidewalk: be used to pedestrian

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents pavement
Weight: 0.65
, place
Weight: 0.62
, area
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.60
Siblings street
Weight: 0.35
, driveway
Weight: 0.35
, alley
Weight: 0.35
, intersection
Weight: 0.34
, patio
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to pedestrian 1.00
be used to traffic and pedestrian 0.96
be used to pedestrian traffic 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(street, be used to traffic and pedestrian)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(street, be used to traffic and pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(street, be used to traffic and pedestrian)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(street, be used to traffic and pedestrian)