silence: be barrier to communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prayer
Weight: 0.60
, language
Weight: 0.60
, answer
Weight: 0.59
, word
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sign language
Weight: 0.31
, english language
Weight: 0.31
, shame
Weight: 0.31
, f word
Weight: 0.31
, italian language
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be barrier to communication 1.00
be important in communication 0.82
be roadblock to communication 0.81
is communication tool 0.77
is effective communication tool 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sign language, be important in communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sign language, be important in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sign language, be important in communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(silence, be barrier to communication)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(silence, be important in communication)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(silence, be important in communication)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(silence, be important in communication)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(silence, be roadblock to communication)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(silence, be roadblock to communication)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(silence, is effective communication tool)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(silence, is effective communication tool)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(silence, is communication tool)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(silence, be important in communication)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(silence, is communication tool)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(silence, is communication tool)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(silence, is effective communication tool)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(silence, be roadblock to communication)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(silence, be roadblock to communication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(silence, is communication tool)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(silence, be barrier to communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(silence, be barrier to communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(silence, be barrier to communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sign language, be important in communication)