silence: is effective communication tool

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents prayer
Weight: 0.60
, language
Weight: 0.60
, answer
Weight: 0.59
, word
Weight: 0.59
Siblings sign language
Weight: 0.31
, english language
Weight: 0.31
, shame
Weight: 0.31
, f word
Weight: 0.31
, italian language
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is effective communication tool 1.00
is communication tool 0.96
is powerful communication tool 0.95
is effective 0.85
be important in communication 0.85
be barrier to communication 0.76
be more effective than words 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(prayer, is effective)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(silence, is effective communication tool)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(prayer, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(prayer, is effective)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(sign language, is effective)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(sign language, be important in communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(prayer, is effective)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(silence, is effective communication tool)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(sign language, is effective)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(sign language, is effective)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(sign language, be important in communication)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(sign language, be important in communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(silence, is effective communication tool)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(silence, is powerful communication tool)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(silence, is powerful communication tool)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(silence, is powerful communication tool)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(silence, is communication tool)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(silence, is communication tool)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(silence, is communication tool)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(silence, be important in communication)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(silence, be important in communication)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(silence, be important in communication)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(silence, is powerful communication tool)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(silence, is communication tool)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(silence, be barrier to communication)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(silence, be important in communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(silence, be barrier to communication)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(silence, be more effective than words)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(silence, be more effective than words)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(silence, be more effective than words)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(silence, be more effective than words)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(silence, be barrier to communication)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(silence, be barrier to communication)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(silence, is effective communication tool)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(prayer, is effective)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(sign language, is effective)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(sign language, be important in communication)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(silence, is effective communication tool)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(prayer, is effective)