silencer: be pain argue

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents firearm
Weight: 0.63
, part
Weight: 0.54
, accessory
Weight: 0.50
, attachment
Weight: 0.49
Siblings submachine gun
Weight: 0.36
, machine gun
Weight: 0.35
, pistol
Weight: 0.35
, shotgun
Weight: 0.34
, handgun
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pain argue 1.00
be pain argue with 0.99
say winmaildat 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(attachment, say winmaildat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(silencer, be pain argue)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(silencer, be pain argue)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(attachment, say winmaildat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(silencer, be pain argue)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(attachment, say winmaildat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(attachment, say winmaildat)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(silencer, be pain argue)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(silencer, be pain argue)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(silencer, be pain argue)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(silencer, be pain argue)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(silencer, be pain argue)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(silencer, be pain argue with)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(silencer, be pain argue)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(silencer, be pain argue with)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(silencer, be pain argue)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(silencer, be pain argue with)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(silencer, be pain argue)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(silencer, be pain argue with)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(silencer, be pain argue)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(silencer, be pain argue)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(silencer, be pain argue)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(silencer, be pain argue)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(silencer, be pain argue)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(silencer, be pain argue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(attachment, say winmaildat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(silencer, be pain argue)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(attachment, say winmaildat)