silencer: be pain argue with

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents firearm
Weight: 0.63
, part
Weight: 0.54
, accessory
Weight: 0.50
, attachment
Weight: 0.49
Siblings submachine gun
Weight: 0.36
, machine gun
Weight: 0.35
, pistol
Weight: 0.35
, shotgun
Weight: 0.34
, handgun
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pain argue with 1.00
be pain argue 0.99
say winmaildat 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(attachment, say winmaildat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(silencer, be pain argue with)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(silencer, be pain argue with) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(attachment, say winmaildat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(silencer, be pain argue with) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(attachment, say winmaildat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(attachment, say winmaildat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(silencer, be pain argue with) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(silencer, be pain argue with)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(silencer, be pain argue with) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(silencer, be pain argue with)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(silencer, be pain argue with) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(silencer, be pain argue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(silencer, be pain argue with) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(silencer, be pain argue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(silencer, be pain argue with) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(silencer, be pain argue)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(silencer, be pain argue with) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(silencer, be pain argue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(silencer, be pain argue with) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(silencer, be pain argue with) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(silencer, be pain argue with)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(silencer, be pain argue with) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(silencer, be pain argue with)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(silencer, be pain argue with) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(attachment, say winmaildat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(silencer, be pain argue with) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(attachment, say winmaildat)