silicon: affect technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents semiconductor
Weight: 0.75
, silicon carbide
Weight: 0.69
, mineral
Weight: 0.67
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, substrate
Weight: 0.62
Siblings germanium
Weight: 0.39
, transistor
Weight: 0.38
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.36
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.36
, iron oxide
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect technology 1.00
affect modern technology 0.92
be important in use of technologies 0.87
be important to technology industry 0.86
be important to computer technology 0.86
be crucial to technology 0.83
be crucial to modern technology 0.81
affect environment 0.79
affect location of industry 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(semiconductor, be important to technology industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(silicon, affect technology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(semiconductor, be important to computer technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(silicon, affect technology)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(silicon, affect technology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(semiconductor, be important to computer technology)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(semiconductor, be important to technology industry)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(raw material, affect location of industry)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(semiconductor, be important to technology industry)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(semiconductor, be important to computer technology)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(transistor, be crucial to modern technology)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(transistor, be important to computer technology)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(semiconductor, be important to technology industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(silicon, affect technology)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(semiconductor, be important to computer technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(silicon, affect technology)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(raw material, affect location of industry) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(silicon, affect technology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(transistor, be important to computer technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(transistor, be important to computer technology)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(transistor, be crucial to modern technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(transistor, be crucial to modern technology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(silicon, affect technology)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(silicon, be important in use of technologies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(silicon, be important in use of technologies)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(silicon, be important in use of technologies)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(silicon, be important in use of technologies)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(silicon, affect technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(silicon, affect technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(semiconductor, be important to computer technology)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(semiconductor, be important to technology industry)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(raw material, affect location of industry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(transistor, be important to computer technology)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(transistor, be crucial to modern technology)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(semiconductor, be important to computer technology)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(semiconductor, be important to technology industry)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(silicon, affect technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(raw material, affect location of industry)