silk: be important in thailand

Related concepts

Parents	fabric Weight: 0.71 , material Weight: 0.64 , textile Weight: 0.60 , commodity Weight: 0.59
Siblings	linen Weight: 0.37 , velvet Weight: 0.37 , rayon Weight: 0.37 , cashmere Weight: 0.37 , wool Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in thailand	1.00
was important to chinese	0.79
was used in india	0.78
was important to chinese in china	0.78
be called manchester in australia	0.78
was important to chinese in ancient china	0.77
manchester in australia	0.77
grow in china europe	0.76
be popular in scotland	0.76
be cheap for britain	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(material, be cheap for britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(silk, be important in thailand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(material, be cheap for britain)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(material, be cheap for britain)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(linen, be called manchester in australia)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Remarkable(cashmere, be popular in scotland)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(linen, manchester in australia)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(material, be cheap for britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(silk, be important in thailand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

Remarkable(linen, be called manchester in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(linen, be called manchester in australia)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(cashmere, was used in india)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

Remarkable(cashmere, be popular in scotland) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(cashmere, be popular in scotland)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(linen, manchester in australia) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Plausible(linen, manchester in australia)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Salient(silk, be important in thailand)

Similarity expansion

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Salient(silk, grow in china europe)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(silk, grow in china europe)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(silk, grow in china europe)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(silk, was important to chinese in ancient china)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(silk, was important to chinese in ancient china)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(silk, grow in china europe)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(silk, was important to chinese in ancient china)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Remarkable(silk, was important to chinese in ancient china)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Salient(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(silk, be important in thailand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(material, be cheap for britain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(linen, be called manchester in australia)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(cashmere, was used in india)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Typical(cashmere, be popular in scotland)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(linen, manchester in australia)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.85

Typical(silk, be important in thailand) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(material, be cheap for britain)