cashmere: was used in india

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.64
, wool
Weight: 0.56
, fiber
Weight: 0.54
, yarn
Weight: 0.54
, fibre
Weight: 0.49
Siblings silk
Weight: 0.37
, tweed
Weight: 0.36
, denim
Weight: 0.35
, linen
Weight: 0.35
, rayon
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
was used in india 1.00
was important to chinese 0.80
be produced in australia 0.79
was important to chinese in china 0.79
be important in thailand 0.78
be called manchester in australia 0.78
manchester in australia 0.77
was important to chinese in ancient china 0.76
was brought to europe 0.76
was brought to medeival europe 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wool, be produced in australia)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cashmere, was used in india)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(wool, be produced in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(wool, be produced in australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(linen, be called manchester in australia)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(linen, manchester in australia)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(silk, was important to chinese in ancient china)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(wool, be produced in australia)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cashmere, was used in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(linen, be called manchester in australia)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(linen, be called manchester in australia)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(silk, be important in thailand)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(silk, be important in thailand)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(linen, manchester in australia)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(linen, manchester in australia)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(silk, was important to chinese in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(silk, was important to chinese in ancient china)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(cashmere, was used in india)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cashmere, was used in india)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wool, be produced in australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(linen, be called manchester in australia)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(linen, manchester in australia)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(silk, be important in thailand)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(silk, was important to chinese in ancient china)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wool, be produced in australia)