silk: was brought to medeival europe

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fabric
Weight: 0.71
, material
Weight: 0.64
, textile
Weight: 0.60
, commodity
Weight: 0.59
Siblings linen
Weight: 0.37
, velvet
Weight: 0.37
, rayon
Weight: 0.37
, cashmere
Weight: 0.37
, wool
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
was brought to medeival europe 1.00
was brought into medieval europe 0.90
grow in china europe 0.81
was made in egypt 0.76
was used in india 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cashmere, was used in india)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cashmere, was used in india)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(silk, was brought to medeival europe)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(silk, was brought into medieval europe)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(silk, was brought into medieval europe)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(silk, was brought into medieval europe)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(silk, was brought into medieval europe)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(silk, grow in china europe)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(silk, grow in china europe)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(silk, grow in china europe)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(silk, grow in china europe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(silk, was brought to medeival europe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(silk, was brought to medeival europe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(silk, was brought to medeival europe)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cashmere, was used in india)