silo: be bad for business

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.56
, item
Weight: 0.53
, building
Weight: 0.50
Siblings eiffel tower
Weight: 0.34
, barn
Weight: 0.34
, chimney
Weight: 0.34
, tower
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for business 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
exist in business 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tower, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tower, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(tower, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(silo, be bad for business)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(silo, exist in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(silo, exist in business)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(silo, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(silo, has quality bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(silo, exist in business)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(silo, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(silo, exist in business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(silo, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(silo, be bad for business)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(silo, be bad for business)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(silo, be bad for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tower, has quality bad)